T-012-007 Formative evaluation plan_YYYY_nnn
Purpose
This document describes the usability evaluation process for the PRODUCT NAME medical device.
Responsibilities
JD-003
- To coordinate the entire design and development process of the products.
JD-005
- To ensure that the entire process of usability evaluation of the products is carried out according to the methodology established in the present procedure.
JD-004
- To ensure that the usability evaluation is performed following this procedure, and that all the records required are properly generated, reviewed, approved and archived accordingly.
Terms and Definitions
- DHF: Design History File
- Formative evaluation: user interface evaluation conducted with the intent to explore user interface design strengths, weaknesses, and unanticipated use errors.
- Hazard-related use scenario: use scenario that could lead to a hazardous situation or harm.
- Primary operating function: the function that involves user interaction that is related to the safety of the medical device.
- QMS: Quality Management System.
- Summative evaluation: user interface evaluation conducted at the end of the user interface development with the intent to obtain objective evidence that the user interface can be used safely.
- Usability: characteristic of the user interface that facilitates use and thereby establishes effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction in the intended use environment.
- Use environment: actual conditions and settings in which users interact with the medical device.
- Use error: user action or lack of user action while using the medical device that leads to a different result than that intended by the manufacturer or expected by the user.
- Use scenario: a specific sequence of tasks performed by a specific user in a specific use environment and any resulting response of the medical device.
- Use or specification: summary of the important characteristics related to the context of use of the medical device.
- User interface: means by which the user and the medical device interact.
- User interface evaluation: the process by which the manufacturer explores or assesses the user interactions with the user interface.
- User interface specification: a collection of specifications that comprehensively and prospectively describe the user interface of a medical device.
General information
The actions aimed at demonstrating the usability of the device are carried out following the standard UNE-EN 62366-1:2015/A1:2020
and the results are registered in the corresponding usability reports R-TF-012-008 Formative evaluation report
and R-TF-012-015 Summative evaluation report
.
The associated reports are included in the corresponding technical file and they must be updated when the main version of the medical device software changes during the product lifecycle leading to a new usability test.
Inputs
- Risk management (according to procedure
GP-013 Risk management
). If we identify any new risks related to usability in theR-TF-013-002 Risk management record
, we must create a new version of theR-TF-012-015 Summative evaluation report
, collecting all this data, and generate a new strategy to comply with usability following the standardUNE-EN 62366-1:2015/A1:2020
. - Feedback and complaints (according to procedure
GP-014 Feedback and complaints
) to look for new requirements that may require a product redesign related to usability. - The information generated by the performance of the post-market activities according to the
GP-007 Post-market surveillance
procedure, will be considered to identify possible interferences related to the usability of the medical device. - Any communication detected during the vigilance activities described at the
GP-004 Vigilance system
that can affect the usability of the product. - The clinical evaluation, which was performed according to the
GP-015 Clinical evaluation
procedure. - When the results require actions to prevent affecting the usability of the device, the guidelines indicated in the General Procedure
GP-006 Non-conformity. Corrective and preventive actions
will be used to determine, design, and document the actions.
Outputs
- To register the results of the formative evaluation, we create a report using the template
R-TF-012-008 Formative evaluation report
. - To register the results of the summative evaluation, we create a report using the template
R-TF-012-015 Summative evaluation report
. - A new entry will be generated in the
R-TF-002-004 Annual management review report
by the corresponding management referring to these changes in the QMS documentation.
Formative evaluation plan
This section details our approach to the formative evaluation of the software, focusing on the identification and rectification of potential usability problems in early development stages, in line with EN 62366-1, 5.7.2
.
Purpose
The purpose of the formative evaluation plan is to identify potential usability problems and rectify them before the summative evaluation phase.
Characterization of the medical device
- Intended purpose:
- Intended user:
- Patient population:
- Operating principle:
- Body structure:
- Indications:
Use specification
Target user group
Insert the user group(s) selected for executing the formative evaluation test, including justification of the choice.
User profile
Insert the profile of the user group(s) in terms of experience, knowledge, background, expertise, training.
Use environment
Describe the environment where the device is intended to be used and the environment where the formative evaluation test will be executed (if it is different from the use environment defined for the use of the device).
Identification of the elements of the user interface
List and describe the elements of the user interface.
Methodology
Describe how the formative evaluation test will be executed, e.g. remote, in-person, number of iterations, expected number of participants, estimated time for test execution, materials to be provided to participants, method to collect feedback of participants.
Scenarios
Describe the test cases that the participants will be asked to execute during the formative evaluation test.
Evaluation questionnaire
Insert the questions provided in the evaluation questionnaire to collect feedback of participants.
Evaluation criteria
Insert success criteria for each test case of the formative evaluation and for results coming from the evaluation questionnaire.
Sampling considerations
Provide information about the sample size and justification for the choice.
Signature meaning
The signatures for the approval process of this document can be found in the verified commits at the repository for the QMS. As a reference, the team members who are expected to participate in this document and their roles in the approval process, as defined in Annex I Responsibility Matrix
of the GP-001
, are:
- Author: Team members involved
- Reviewer: JD-003, JD-004
- Approver: JD-001
Delete this section when you create a new record from this template.
Signature meaning
The signatures for the approval process of this document can be found in the verified commits at the repository for the QMS. As a reference, the team members who are expected to participate in this document and their roles in the approval process, as defined in Annex I Responsibility Matrix
of the GP-001
, are:
- Author: Team members involved
- Reviewer: JD-003, JD-004
- Approver: JD-001