T-TF-028-010 AI V&V Checks
Table of contents
Purpose
This checklist is used to verify that the Verification & Validation Phase of the AI development lifecycle has been completed in accordance with procedure GP-028 AI Development. It ensures that the AI Development Report and AI Release Report are complete, all performance criteria have been met, and the algorithm package is ready for integration into the target software environment.
Instructions
The verifier must assess each item in the checklist. For each item, select "Yes," "No," or "N/A" and provide comments where necessary, especially for any "No" answers. All "No" items must be resolved before the V&V Phase can be considered complete and the algorithm package can be released.
Checklist
R-TF-028-005 AI Development Report
| Check Item | Yes/No/NA | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Is the data management process fully documented and traceable? | ||
| 2. Is the training methodology comprehensively described for each model? | ||
| 3. Are performance results presented with appropriate statistical measures (e.g., confidence intervals)? | ||
| 4. Do all models meet their predefined performance criteria as specified in R-TF-028-001? | ||
| 5. Has bias analysis been conducted across relevant subpopulations? | ||
| 6. Are bias analysis results acceptable for all subgroups? | ||
| 7. Has the test set been properly sequestered and used only for final evaluation? |
R-TF-028-006 AI Release Report
| Check Item | Yes/No/NA | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Are all models included in the release package documented? | ||
| 2. Are input/output specifications clearly defined for each model? | ||
| 3. Are preprocessing requirements fully specified? | ||
| 4. Are post-processing requirements fully specified? | ||
| 5. Are configuration files complete and correct? | ||
| 6. Are integration guidelines sufficient for the software development team? | ||
| 7. Is the model file format appropriate and documented (e.g., ONNX version)? |
Algorithm Package Verification
| Check Item | Yes/No/NA | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Are all model files present and accessible? | ||
| 2. Are all configuration files present and valid? | ||
| 3. Do model versions match the documentation? | ||
| 4. Have the models been tested for basic functionality (inference runs without errors)? | ||
| 5. Is the package versioned and stored in the designated repository? |
Risk Assessment Integration
| Check Item | Yes/No/NA | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Has the AI Risk Matrix (R-TF-028-011) been updated based on development findings? | ||
| 2. Are all residual risks at acceptable or tolerable levels? | ||
| 3. Have safety risks related to AI been communicated to the product team? |
Traceability
| Check Item | Yes/No/NA | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Is there clear traceability from requirements (R-TF-028-001) to test results? | ||
| 2. Are all design decisions documented and justified? | ||
| 3. Are all data sources traceable and documented? |
Conclusion
State the overall outcome of the V&V check.
☐ V&V Phase Approved: All checks have been successfully passed. The algorithm package is cleared for release to the software development team.
☐ V&V Phase Not Approved: One or more checks have failed. The responsible team members must address the comments and resubmit the documentation for verification.
Overall Comments:
Provide any summary comments or required actions here.
Release Authorization
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Package Version | |
| Release Date | |
| Repository Location |
Verification
Signature meaning
The signatures for the approval process of this document can be found in the verified commits at the repository for the QMS. As a reference, the team members who are expected to participate in this document and their roles in the approval process, as defined in Annex I Responsibility Matrix of the GP-001, are:
- Author: JD-009
- Reviewer: JD-009
- Approver: JD-005