Skip to main content
QMSQMS
QMS
  • Welcome to your QMS
  • Quality Manual
  • Procedures
  • Records
  • Legit.Health Plus Version 1.1.0.0
  • Legit.Health Plus Version 1.1.0.1
  • Licenses and accreditations
  • Applicable Standards and Regulations
  • Grants
    • Planning
    • Red.es RedIA Salud 2025
    • EPIC-X 2026
      • Instructions (CLAUDE.md)
      • Application
      • Resources
      • EPIC-X Grant Application - Data Request for Teams
      • EPIC-X 2026 Grant Application: Gap Analysis & Prioritization
      • EPIC-X 2026 Application - Quality Review Checklist
  • Pricing
  • Public tenders
  • Grants
  • EPIC-X 2026
  • EPIC-X 2026 Application - Quality Review Checklist

EPIC-X 2026 Application - Quality Review Checklist

Purpose: Ensure all 100 evaluation points are comprehensively addressed with evidence-based content

Review Date: December 22, 2024

Reviewer: [To be completed by Andy Aguilar + leadership team]


Evaluation Criteria Coverage (100 Points Total)​

A. Excellence and Innovation (40 Points)​

A.1 Relevance to EPIC-X Scope (15 Points)​

Criteria: Deep-tech innovation, alignment with AI/ML + healthcare, scalability, market potential, S3 priorities

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
Deep-tech AI/ML innovation5 ptsSection 2 (AI/ML Architecture)✅ CompleteCNNs, Vision Transformers, severity algorithms (7 scales, 239 conditions)None
Clinical validation rigor3 ptsSection 2 (Clinical Validation)⚠️ Needs data7 studies, 1000+ patients mentionedACTION: Add specific patient counts (n) per study, publication DOIs
Regulatory achievements3 ptsSection 2 (Regulatory Excellence)⚠️ Needs dataCE MDR Class IIb, AEMPS, MHRA, ANVISA, FDA ongoingACTION: Add certificate numbers, exact dates
Scalability (horizontal/vertical)2 ptsSection 2 (Scalability)✅ Complete239→400 conditions (horizontal), 4 use cases (vertical), 3→30 countries (geographic)None
SOTA performance comparison2 ptsSection 2 (Performance vs. SOTA)⚠️ Needs dataTables created for melanoma, psoriasis, severity scalesACTION: Fill UPDATE placeholders with actual performance metrics from PC files

Subtotal A.1: 15 points - Status: 70% complete, 30% needs data

Overall Assessment: Strong foundation with detailed AI/ML architecture and regulatory achievements. Need to populate performance metrics and clinical study details.


A.2 Unbiased Mission (10 Points)​

Criteria: Gender equality focus, inclusive AI design, bias-free models, social impact

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
Women-led company evidence3 ptsSection 6 (entire), Section 2✅ CompleteAndy: CEO + Co-founder + 33.33% + Board Chair, 8+ years leadershipNone
Inclusive AI design (skin tone)3 ptsSection 2 (Fitzpatrick Equity), Section 6⚠️ Needs dataPC-042 table created, Fitzpatrick I-VI training data distributionACTION: Fill Fitzpatrick performance equity table with actual accuracy % by skin tone
Gender-balanced performance2 ptsSection 2, Section 6⚠️ Needs dataGender performance comparison table createdACTION: Add actual accuracy by gender for 4+ conditions
Women's health focus2 ptsSection 2, Section 6✅ CompleteMelasma (90% women), pregnancy dermatoses (100%), lupus (90%), hormonal acne (70%) coveredNone

Subtotal A.2: 10 points - Status: 50% complete, 50% needs data

Overall Assessment: Strong narrative on women leadership and women's health focus. Critical gap: Need to populate Fitzpatrick equity and gender performance tables with real data from Performance Claims.


A.3 Business Coaching Plan (10 Points)​

Criteria: Clear needs assessment, measurable outcomes, strategic fit, realistic EUR 20k allocation

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
Needs assessment clarity3 ptsSection 5 (Needs Assessment)✅ Complete4 challenges identified with knowledge gaps and impact if unresolvedNone
Coaching plan structure3 ptsSection 5 (4 Modules)✅ Complete20 days, EUR 20K (33.3% of grant), day-by-day deliverables for each moduleNone
Measurable KPIs2 ptsSection 5 (Success Metrics)✅ Complete6-month and 12-month KPIs for each module with specific targetsNone
Integration with work plan2 ptsSection 5 (Integration)✅ CompleteMonthly alignment table showing Module activities mapped to Q2-Q3 2026 timelineNone

Subtotal A.3: 10 points - Status: 100% complete ✅

Overall Assessment: Excellent. Coaching plan is detailed, realistic, and tightly integrated with implementation timeline.


A.4 European Added Value (5 Points)​

Criteria: EU market focus, cross-border potential, regulatory compliance (GDPR, MDR)

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
CE MDR 30-country access2 ptsSection 2 (European Value)✅ CompleteCE MDR Class IIb valid across 27 EU + 3 EEA = 30 countriesNone
GDPR compliance1 ptSection 2 (European Value)✅ CompleteData minimization, consent, EU servers (AWS Frankfurt), DPIA completedNone
FHIR interoperability1 ptSection 2 (European Value)⚠️ Needs validationFHIR Resources implemented: Patient, Observation, DiagnosticReport, MediaACTION: Confirm with Engineering team which FHIR resources are actually implemented
Cross-border value1 ptSection 2 (European Value)✅ CompletePan-European dermatologist shortage (5.5 Spain, 4.2 Germany, 6.8 France, 5.1 Italy per 100K)None

Subtotal A.4: 5 points - Status: 80% complete, 20% needs validation

Overall Assessment: Strong EU alignment. Minor action: Confirm technical FHIR implementation details.


SECTION A TOTAL: 40 points - Overall Status: 75% complete, 25% needs data/validation


B. Impact and Market Potential (25 Points)​

B.1 Impact on Growth (15 Points)​

Criteria: Revenue trajectory, market size, expansion plan, short/medium/long-term impacts

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
TAM/SAM quantification3 ptsSection 3 (Market Opportunity)⚠️ Needs sourceTAM: USD $4.7B by 2030, 12.5% CAGRACTION: Add market research source (Mordor Intelligence, Grand View Research, etc.)
Historical revenue traction3 ptsSection 3 (Revenue Traction)⚠️ Needs dataEUR 192K+ won contracts (5 deals listed from HubSpot)ACTION: Add 2022-2024 annual revenue figures, YoY growth %
Revenue projections credibility3 ptsSection 3 (Revenue Projections)⚠️ Needs data2025-2027 projections table createdACTION: Fill 2024 baseline, validate 2025-2027 projections with Finance team
EPIC-X grant ROI3 ptsSection 3 (EPIC-X Funding Impact)✅ CompleteEUR 250K+ ARR impact Year 1 (4.2x return), detailed allocation tableNone
Short/medium/long-term impact3 ptsSection 3 (Impact timelines)✅ Complete6-12 months (EUR 650K ARR), 1-2 years (EUR 1.2M-2.5M), 3-5 years (EUR 10M+)None

Subtotal B.1: 15 points - Status: 60% complete, 40% needs data

Overall Assessment: Strong ROI narrative and growth trajectory structure. Critical gap: Need actual historical revenue data and market research source citation.


B.2 Regional Ecosystem Impact (10 Points)​

Criteria: Technological contributions, societal impact, environmental benefits, economic value, role model effect

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
Research contributions2 ptsSection 3 (Technological Contributions)⚠️ Needs data6+ publications mentioned, table createdACTION: Add full publication citations (authors, titles, journals, DOIs, citation counts)
Healthcare equity impact3 ptsSection 3 (Societal Impact)⚠️ Needs data50K patients target (2027), wait time reduction, rural accessACTION: Add baseline metrics (current patients served, current wait times)
Women's health impact2 ptsSection 3 (Women's Health)✅ CompleteMelasma, pregnancy dermatoses, lupus, hormonal acne coverage with incidence ratesNone
Environmental impact1 ptSection 3 (Environmental)✅ Complete320 tons CO2 avoided annually (teleconsultations reduce travel)None
Job creation1 ptSection 3 (Economic Value)✅ Complete31→55 FTEs (2024→2027), indirect employment (clinical coordinators, consultants)None
Role model effect1 ptSection 3, Section 6✅ CompleteAndy's visibility initiatives (5+ talks, 3+ media, 10+ mentees)None

Subtotal B.2: 10 points - Status: 70% complete, 30% needs data

Overall Assessment: Strong societal and environmental narrative. Need to add publication details and baseline healthcare equity metrics.


SECTION B TOTAL: 25 points - Overall Status: 64% complete, 36% needs data


C. Implementation and Capacity (35 Points)​

C.1 Quality and Feasibility of Work Plan (20 Points)​

Criteria: Clear milestones, realistic timeline, deliverables alignment, risk management, feasibility

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
12-month timeline detail6 ptsSection 4 (Q1-Q4 Work Plan)✅ CompleteMonth-by-month, week-by-week breakdown (April 2026 - March 2027)None
Milestone clarity4 ptsSection 4 (Deliverables Summary)✅ Complete6 EPIC-X tasks mapped, quarterly summaries, monthly deliverablesNone
Risk management4 ptsSection 4 (Risk Register)✅ CompleteTop 5 risks with likelihood, impact, mitigation, contingency, ownerNone
Feasibility assessment3 ptsSection 4 (entire)✅ CompleteRealistic based on 8+ years track record, 4 regulatory clearances, EUR 192K+ contractsNone
Integration across modules3 ptsSection 4, Section 5✅ CompleteCoaching modules aligned with work plan timeline, synergies identifiedNone

Subtotal C.1: 20 points - Status: 100% complete ✅

Overall Assessment: Excellent. Work plan is detailed, realistic, and well-integrated with coaching plan. No gaps.


C.2 Team and Resources (10 Points)​

Criteria: Expertise, track record, organizational capacity, women in leadership emphasis

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
CEO/Founder track record3 ptsSection 4 (Andy Aguilar), Section 6✅ Complete8+ years CEO, Forbes 30 Under 30, 4 pre-Legit ventures, B.B.A. Tec de MonterreyNone
Management team expertise3 ptsSection 4 (Management Team)⚠️ Needs dataTable created for CTO, Head MDS, Regulatory, Commercial, CFOACTION: Add names, backgrounds, achievements for 5 management roles
Organizational certifications2 ptsSection 4 (Certifications)⚠️ Needs dataISO 13485, CE MDR, GDPR listedACTION: Add certificate numbers and exact dates
Team diversity2 ptsSection 4, Section 6⚠️ Needs data31 FTEs total, tables created for women % overall/leadership/technicalACTION: Fill team composition tables with actual gender breakdown

Subtotal C.2: 10 points - Status: 30% complete, 70% needs data

Overall Assessment: Strong CEO narrative. Critical gap: Need management team details and team diversity metrics.


C.3 Budget and Cost-Effectiveness (5 Points)​

Criteria: Appropriate allocation, cost-effectiveness, ROI justification, co-financing

Sub-CriterionWeightSection LocationStatusEvidence ProvidedGaps/Actions
EUR 60K allocation justification2 ptsSection 4 (Budget Breakdown)✅ CompleteDetailed line items with rationale (US 58.3%, EU 25%, Women 16.7%)None
Co-financing demonstration2 ptsSection 4 (Co-Financing)✅ CompleteEUR 270K co-financing (EUR 150K personnel, EUR 30K infra, EUR 50K studies, EUR 40K in-kind)None
ROI calculation1 ptSection 4 (ROI)✅ CompleteDirect: 4.2x Year 1, Indirect: 714-1,429x (Series A), 3.9x more cost-effective than alternativesNone

Subtotal C.3: 5 points - Status: 100% complete ✅

Overall Assessment: Excellent. Budget is well-justified with strong ROI narrative and substantial co-financing.


SECTION C TOTAL: 35 points - Overall Status: 71% complete, 29% needs data


Overall Application Status​

CriterionMax PointsStatus% CompleteCritical Gaps
A. Excellence & Innovation40⚠️ Needs data75%Performance metrics (SOTA, Fitzpatrick, gender), clinical study details
B. Impact & Market25⚠️ Needs data64%Historical revenue, publication citations, market research source
C. Implementation & Capacity35⚠️ Needs data71%Management team details, team diversity metrics, certificate numbers
TOTAL100⚠️ Needs data71%29% gaps to fill

Critical Data Collection Priority List​

Priority 1: Performance & Technical Data (Section 2 - 40 points at stake)​

Owner: Medical Data Science Team + Product Team

Data NeededFile LocationAction
PC-042 Fitzpatrick equity table/packages/ui/src/components/PerformanceClaimsAndClinicalBenefits/performanceClaims.tsExtract actual accuracy % by Fitzpatrick type I-VI, populate Section 2 table
Gender performance comparisonPerformance Claims fileExtract accuracy by gender for acne, psoriasis, melanoma, atopic dermatitis
SOTA benchmarksPerformance Claims file or literaturePopulate melanoma, psoriasis, severity scale comparison tables with actual %
FHIR implementation statusEngineering teamConfirm which FHIR Resources are actually implemented (Patient, Observation, etc.)

Estimated Time: 2-3 hours (MDS team extracts data, copies to UPDATE placeholders)


Priority 2: Clinical & Regulatory Data (Sections 2, 3 - 55 points at stake)​

Owner: Clinical Team + Regulatory Team

Data NeededSourceAction
7 clinical studies detailsImplementation plans at /apps/qms/docs/records/GP-009/r-009-001/For each study: patient count (n), exact dates, hospital name, publication status
6+ publication citationsClinical team bibliographyAuthors, title, journal, year, DOI, citation count for 6+ papers
Certificate numbersRegulatory filesISO 13485 cert #, CE MDR cert #, AEMPS license #, MHRA registration #, ANVISA registration #
Exact CE MDR clearance dateRegulatory filesMonth and year of CE certificate issuance
FDA 510(k) predicate deviceRegulatory teamIdentify predicate device for substantial equivalence strategy

Estimated Time: 3-4 hours (Regulatory + Clinical gather docs, extract data)


Priority 3: Financial & Team Data (Sections 3, 4 - 40 points at stake)​

Owner: Finance Team + HR Team

Data NeededSourceAction
2022-2024 annual revenueFinancial statementsTotal revenue for 2022, 2023, 2024 + YoY growth %
2025-2027 revenue projectionsFinancial modelValidate projections in Section 3 table, adjust if needed
Market research sourceCommercial team or FinanceCite source for USD $4.7B TAM (Mordor Intelligence, Grand View Research, etc.)
Management team detailsHR + LeadershipFor CTO, Head MDS, Regulatory, Commercial, CFO: Name, background (education/experience), 2-3 key achievements
Team gender breakdownHR records% women overall, % women in leadership, % women in technical roles (MDS + Engineering)
Co-founders 2 & 3 detailsLegal/FinanceNames, roles, board positions

Estimated Time: 2-3 hours (Finance + HR extract data from existing docs)


Priority 4: Andy Aguilar Personal Data (Section 6 - 10 points at stake)​

Owner: Andy Aguilar

Data NeededSourceAction
Board Chair appointment dateCorporate recordsYear appointed Presidenta del Consejo
Forbes categoryForbes award detailsConfirm specific Forbes 30 Under 30 category (Healthcare, Tech, Entrepreneurs?)
2-3 recent board decisionsBoard meeting minutesExamples of strategic decisions led by Andy (with dates)
Conference speaking logAndy's calendarList of conferences where Andy spoke in 2023-2024
Personal statementAndy writes2-3 paragraphs on women in deep-tech, inclusive AI vision, role model responsibility

Estimated Time: 1-2 hours (Andy provides info, writes personal statement)


Data Collection Sprint Plan (Recommended)​

Timeline: 1-2 days concentrated effort

Day 1 Morning (3 hours):

  • Medical Data Science team extracts Performance Claims data (Priority 1)
  • Clinical + Regulatory teams gather study details and certificates (Priority 2)

Day 1 Afternoon (3 hours):

  • Finance + HR teams extract revenue, team composition data (Priority 3)
  • Andy provides personal info and writes statement (Priority 4)

Day 2 Morning (2 hours):

  • Update all 6 sections with collected data (find/replace UPDATE placeholders)
  • Cross-check all tables for consistency

Day 2 Afternoon (2 hours):

  • Final quality review (re-run this checklist)
  • Stakeholder review meeting (Andy + MDS + Regulatory + Commercial)

Total Effort: ~10 hours concentrated work across 5-6 people


Stakeholder Review Meeting (Recommended)​

Duration: 1 hour

Attendees:

  • Andy Aguilar (CEO) - Overall review, women leadership content, coaching plan
  • Head of Medical Data Science - Technical accuracy (AI/ML architecture, performance claims)
  • Head of Regulatory - Compliance content (CE MDR, FDA strategy, ISO 13485)
  • Head of Commercial - Market data (revenue, contracts, customer retention)
  • CFO - Financial projections, budget allocation, ROI calculations

Agenda:

  1. Review each section for factual accuracy (20 min)
  2. Validate performance metrics and claims (15 min)
  3. Confirm regulatory/compliance statements (10 min)
  4. Verify financial projections and co-financing (10 min)
  5. Final approval and sign-off (5 min)

Content Strengths (No Action Needed)​

✅ Narrative & Structure: All 6 sections well-organized, professional tone, evidence-based assertions

✅ Coaching Plan: Exceptional detail (20 days, EUR 20K, day-by-day deliverables, KPIs)

✅ Work Plan: Detailed 12-month timeline with monthly/weekly breakdown, risk register

✅ Women Leadership: Comprehensive Andy Aguilar biography, ownership evidence, role model narrative

✅ Budget Justification: Strong ROI (4.2x direct, 714-1,429x via Series A), EUR 270K co-financing

✅ EU Alignment: CE MDR 30-country access, GDPR compliance, cross-border value proposition


Final Checklist Before Submission​

  • All UPDATE placeholders filled with real data (0 remaining)
  • Performance Claims tables populated (Fitzpatrick equity, gender performance, SOTA)
  • Clinical study details complete (7 studies: n, dates, hospitals, publications)
  • Publication citations complete (6+ papers with DOIs, authors, citations)
  • Certificate numbers added (ISO 13485, CE MDR, AEMPS, MHRA, ANVISA)
  • Management team details added (5 leaders: names, backgrounds, achievements)
  • Team diversity metrics added (% women overall/leadership/technical)
  • Historical revenue added (2022-2024 actual, YoY growth)
  • Market research source cited (TAM source attribution)
  • Andy's personal statement added (2-3 paragraphs)
  • Co-founders 2 & 3 details added (names, roles, board positions)
  • FHIR implementation confirmed (which Resources actually implemented)
  • Stakeholder review completed (Andy + MDS + Regulatory + Commercial sign-off)
  • Language/tone review (professional, no typos, consistent terminology)
  • Tables formatted correctly (all columns aligned, no broken Markdown)
  • External forms completed (Annexes 2-4 copy content from sections)
  • Pitch video recorded (2-minute Andy presentation)

Scoring Confidence Assessment​

If all data collected and no gaps:

CriterionEstimated Score RangeConfidence Level
A.1 Relevance to EPIC-X (15pts)13-15 ptsHigh (strong deep-tech, SOTA performance, CE MDR Class IIb)
A.2 Unbiased Mission (10pts)8-10 ptsHigh (women CEO, Fitzpatrick equity, women's health focus)
A.3 Coaching Plan (10pts)9-10 ptsVery High (detailed 20-day plan, EUR 20K, clear KPIs)
A.4 European Value (5pts)4-5 ptsHigh (CE MDR, GDPR, FHIR, EU expansion)
B.1 Growth Impact (15pts)12-14 ptsMedium-High (strong trajectory, need credible projections)
B.2 Ecosystem Impact (10pts)8-10 ptsHigh (publications, healthcare equity, role model)
C.1 Work Plan Quality (20pts)18-20 ptsVery High (detailed timeline, risk register, feasibility)
C.2 Team & Resources (10pts)8-9 ptsHigh (8+ years track record, ISO 13485, diverse team)
C.3 Budget (5pts)5 ptsVery High (detailed allocation, strong ROI, co-financing)
ESTIMATED TOTAL85-95 ptsCompetitive (50pt minimum to pass)

Minimum Threshold: 50 points required to pass → Expected to exceed by 70-90%

Competitive Positioning: With all data filled, application should be highly competitive for 1 of 20 selected startups


Recommended Next Actions​

Immediate (Next 24 hours):

  1. Share this checklist with Finance, Clinical, Regulatory, HR, MDS teams
  2. Schedule 2-day data collection sprint
  3. Assign specific UPDATE placeholders to each team member

Short-term (Next 2-3 days): 4. Populate all UPDATE placeholders with collected data 5. Conduct stakeholder review meeting (1 hour) 6. Final quality review pass (re-run this checklist)

Before Dec 19, 2025 (Internal Deadline): 7. Complete external forms (Annexes 2-4) 8. Record 2-minute pitch video 9. Prepare all supporting documents (certificates, publications, contracts)

Before Jan 5, 2026 (Official Deadline): 10. Upload to EPIC-X portal: https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/ce2aa52e-20db-8c4b-7e39-396bbdcc9e91 11. Submit and save confirmation 12. Update CLAUDE.md task tracking (mark all deliverables complete)


Conclusion​

Application Status: 71% complete structurally, 29% data gaps

Strengths: Excellent narrative structure, detailed coaching plan, comprehensive work plan, strong women leadership evidence

Priority Actions: 2-day data collection sprint across 5 teams to fill UPDATE placeholders (estimated 10 hours total effort)

Confidence Assessment: With all data collected, application is highly competitive for EPIC-X selection (estimated 85-95 points out of 100)

Timeline to Completion: 2-3 days from data collection to final submission-ready application

This application represents a strong foundation that, once data gaps are filled, will demonstrate Legit.Health's exceptional qualifications as a women-led deep-tech company ready for EPIC-X acceleration.

Previous
EPIC-X 2026 Grant Application: Gap Analysis & Prioritization
Next
Pricing
  • Evaluation Criteria Coverage (100 Points Total)
    • A. Excellence and Innovation (40 Points)
      • A.1 Relevance to EPIC-X Scope (15 Points)
      • A.2 Unbiased Mission (10 Points)
      • A.3 Business Coaching Plan (10 Points)
      • A.4 European Added Value (5 Points)
    • B. Impact and Market Potential (25 Points)
      • B.1 Impact on Growth (15 Points)
      • B.2 Regional Ecosystem Impact (10 Points)
    • C. Implementation and Capacity (35 Points)
      • C.1 Quality and Feasibility of Work Plan (20 Points)
      • C.2 Team and Resources (10 Points)
      • C.3 Budget and Cost-Effectiveness (5 Points)
  • Overall Application Status
  • Critical Data Collection Priority List
    • Priority 1: Performance & Technical Data (Section 2 - 40 points at stake)
    • Priority 2: Clinical & Regulatory Data (Sections 2, 3 - 55 points at stake)
    • Priority 3: Financial & Team Data (Sections 3, 4 - 40 points at stake)
    • Priority 4: Andy Aguilar Personal Data (Section 6 - 10 points at stake)
  • Data Collection Sprint Plan (Recommended)
  • Stakeholder Review Meeting (Recommended)
  • Content Strengths (No Action Needed)
  • Final Checklist Before Submission
  • Scoring Confidence Assessment
  • Recommended Next Actions
  • Conclusion
All the information contained in this QMS is confidential. The recipient agrees not to transmit or reproduce the information, neither by himself nor by third parties, through whichever means, without obtaining the prior written permission of Legit.Health (AI Labs Group S.L.)