Skip to main content
QMSQMS
QMS
  • Welcome to your QMS
  • Quality Manual
  • Procedures
  • Records
  • Legit.Health Plus Version 1.1.0.0
  • Legit.Health Plus Version 1.1.0.1
  • Legit.Health version 2.1 (Legacy MDD)
  • Legit.Health US Version 1.1.0.0
  • Legit.Health Utilities
  • Licenses and accreditations
  • Applicable Standards and Regulations
  • BSI Non-Conformities
    • Technical Review
    • Clinical Review
      • Round 1
        • Item 0: Background & Action Plan
        • Item 1: CER Update Frequency
        • Item 2: Device Description & Claims
        • Item 3: Clinical Data
        • Item 4: Usability
        • Item 5: PMS Plan
        • Item 6: PMCF Plan
        • Item 7: Risk
        • completed-tasks
          • task-3b10-legacy-pms-document-hierarchy-refactor
          • task-3b11-sme-coverage-subspecialty-documentation
          • task-3b12-phase-1-exploratory-per-bucket-c-feature
          • task-3b13-man-2025-cep-cip-completeness
            • CEP row rewrite — MAN_2025 Confirmatory-Phase row
            • CIP field extract — MAN_2025 → CEP row
            • Do we need this task?
            • Reviewer-agents pass — task-3b13 CEP/Stat-summary MAN_2025 alignment
          • task-3b14-ifu-integration-requirements-verification
          • task-3b4-mrmc-dark-phototypes
          • task-3b6-surrogate-endpoint-literature-review
          • task-3b7-icd-per-epidemiological-group-vv
          • task-3b8-safety-confirmation-column-definition
          • task-3b9-legacy-pms-conclusions-into-plus-pms-plan
        • Coverage matrix
        • resources
        • Task 3b-5: Autoimmune and Genodermatoses Triangulated-Evidence Package
      • Evidence rank & phases
      • Pre-submission review of R-TF-015-001 CEP and R-TF-015-003 CER
  • Pricing
  • Public tenders
  • Trainings
  • BSI Non-Conformities
  • Clinical Review
  • Round 1
  • completed-tasks
  • task-3b13-man-2025-cep-cip-completeness
  • CEP row rewrite — MAN_2025 Confirmatory-Phase row

CEP row rewrite — MAN_2025 Confirmatory-Phase row

Internal artefact for task-3b13. This is the verbatim replacement markup that was applied to R-TF-015-001-Clinical-Evaluation-Plan.mdx at the MAN_2025 row of the Confirmatory Phase pivotal-investigations table. Applied 2026-04-21.

Before (stale)​

Five Planned strings:

**State of process**: Planned
**Initiation date**: Planned
**Inclusion period**: Planned. This study will include a minimum of 5 dermatologists to assess 149 images of skin conditions representing Fitzpatrick phototype V-VI presentations.
**Completion date**: Planned
**Date of the study report**: Planned

After (factual)​

  • **State of process**: Completed
  • Milestones cell (Type-of-study column kept unchanged except for State of process flipped to Completed):
    • **Initiation date**: January 21, 2026
    • **Inclusion period**: January 21, 2026 to April 17, 2026
    • Reader-count prose: "This study included 16 healthcare professionals (primary analysis cohort; 19 enrolled, 3 screen failures) to assess 149 images of Fitzpatrick phototype V-VI skin presentations."
    • **Sample-size rationale**: two-sided McNemar paired-binary power calculation (baseline 60 %, target 70 %, α = 0.05, 1 − β = 0.80, 25 % discordant proportion) requiring approximately 200 paired observations; the conservative 5-reader × 149-image floor provides 745 paired observations (effective N ≈ 460 at ICC 0.15). Full derivation in R-TF-015-004 §Sample size.
    • **Reference standard**: published atlas diagnosis encoded as ICD-11, established prior to and independently of the investigation, consistent with the methodology of SAN_2024, BI_2024 and PH_2024; see R-TF-015-004 §Reference standard (ground truth).
    • **Completion date**: April 17, 2026
    • **Date of the study report**: as recorded on the signature block of the signed Clinical Investigation Report (R-TF-015-006 MAN_2025 instance).

Primary objectives, secondary objectives and acceptance-criteria cells were left unchanged.

Design choices baked in​

  • Initiation date: the data-collection start date (21 January 2026) was chosen, matching the convention used in the SAN_2024 / BI_2024 / PH_2024 / MC_EVCDAO_2019 / IDEI_2023 rows of the same table. The planning-phase start (October 2025) was rejected because no other completed row uses the pre-data-collection planning phase.
  • Reader count: the CIP-time aspirational "≥ 5 dermatologists" was replaced with the CIR's actual 19 enrolled / 16 primary cohort / 3 screen failures.
  • Completion date: the data-lock date (17 April 2026).
  • Date of the study report: cross-reference to the CIR's <Signature /> block (no fixed calendar date in the MDX source; consistent with the CIR's own convention at R-TF-015-006 line 58).
  • Sample-size and reference-standard summaries: added per the task brief's recommendation and per the do-we-need-this.md "Recommended" scope. The full power calculation derivation stays in the CIP — the CEP row carries only a summary with a CIP cross-reference.
  • Pillar 3 §4.4 at Rank 11 anchoring: preserved verbatim. This is a hard requirement from the celine-clinical-consultant methodological framework (Celine Horiana consultation, 2026-04-17) — the MRMC MAN_2025 row must not drift into Pillar 2.
  • Cross-references: all named-identifier-only (R-TF-015-004 MAN_2025 instance, R-TF-015-006 MAN_2025 instance). No internal folder paths, no CLAUDE.md references, no BSI ticket IDs.

Ripple edits made outside the CEP row​

Summarised here for traceability; full detail is in the plan at /Users/taigmaccarthy/.claude/plans/let-s-takle-the-task-inherited-pebble.md.

  • CEP line 955 — Phase-3 mermaid diagram node MAN["MAN_2025: Fitzpatrick phototypes V-VI (planned)"] → drop (planned) suffix.
  • CEP line 39 — portfolio-status prose: "Investigations listed with status 'Planned' are governed by this Plan for execution..." rewritten so the "Planned" antecedent is non-empty under the new table state (clause now explicitly scopes to PMCF-phase investigations).
  • r-tf-015-013-statistical-summary.mdx — scope sentence (line 11), table-cell state marker (line 24), aggregate total (line 26, 878/9 → 1,027/10), §MAN_2025 body section (heading, status, reader panel, caution admonition, pathology table refreshed to the CIR's 28-condition × 149-image set with ICD-11 codes), and four supporting-studies footnotes all synchronised with the completed state.

Cross-reference audit​

No internal-infrastructure references were introduced into audit-visible documents. Every cross-reference used in the new CEP row text and the r-tf-015-013-statistical-summary.mdx edits is an audit-visible identifier (R-TF-015-004, R-TF-015-006) with a section name.

Previous
Do we need this task?
Next
CIP field extract — MAN_2025 → CEP row
  • Before (stale)
  • After (factual)
  • Design choices baked in
  • Ripple edits made outside the CEP row
  • Cross-reference audit
All the information contained in this QMS is confidential. The recipient agrees not to transmit or reproduce the information, neither by himself nor by third parties, through whichever means, without obtaining the prior written permission of Legit.Health (AI Labs Group S.L.)